🏛️ Power Sharing — Class 10

Belgium vs Sri Lanka, forms of power sharing, federalism, and democratic government

1. Case Studies: Belgium and Sri Lanka

💡 The Belgian Model — Success Story

Demographics: Belgium (10 million people) has 3 communities — Dutch (59%, Flemish), French (40%), German (1%)

Historical problem: French-speaking minority (Wallonia region) was richer and dominated politics. Dutch speakers resented this.

Solution — Power Sharing:

• Equal number of French and Dutch ministers in Central Government

• Many powers transferred to regional governments (3 regions: Flemish, Walloon, Brussels)

• Community government for cultural matters

• Brussels has separate government (both communities have equal representation)

Result: Belgium avoided civil war and remained united! Today it's headquarters of EU and NATO.

💡 Sri Lanka — Cautionary Tale

Demographics: 74% Sinhalese (Buddhist), 18% Tamils (Hindu/Christian), 7% Muslim

Problem: After independence (1948), Sinhalese majority dominated. Policies favoured Sinhalese (Sinhala as only official language, preferential treatment in government jobs, university admissions).

Tamils (concentrated in north) felt alienated, discriminated against.

Consequence: Tamil groups formed militant organisations → Civil War! LTTE (Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam) fought for separate Tamil state (Eelam).

Lesson: Imposing majority rule without protecting minorities leads to conflict and instability.

⚡ Key Lesson from Comparison

Belgium: Accommodated diverse groups through power sharing → peace and stability

Sri Lanka: Majority imposed its will → discrimination → civil war → instability

Conclusion: Power sharing is desirable and necessary for sustainable democracy, especially in diverse societies.

2. Why Power Sharing is Important

📖 Two Arguments for Power Sharing

1. Prudential argument (practical): Power sharing reduces the possibility of conflict between social groups. Conflict leads to violence and instability which is bad for all groups. Distributing power reduces these tensions. → Majority rule can destroy democracy.

2. Moral argument (principled): Power sharing is intrinsically good in a democracy. The spirit of democracy demands that citizens participate in governance. Not sharing power is undemocratic. Even if minority is small, their voice matters.

3. Forms of Power Sharing

3.1 Horizontal Power Sharing

📖 Separation of Powers (Organs of Government)

Power is shared among different organs of government at the same level:

Legislature (Parliament/Assembly) — makes laws

Executive (President, PM, Council of Ministers) — implements laws

Judiciary (Supreme Court, High Courts) — interprets laws

Each organ checks and balances the other's power → prevents concentration of power in one place

3.2 Vertical Power Sharing (Federalism)

📖 Power at Different Levels

Power is shared at different levels of government:

Union (Central) Government — subjects of national importance (defence, foreign affairs)

State Governments — subjects of regional importance (police, agriculture, health)

Local Government (Panchayati Raj) — grassroots governance

3.3 Power Sharing among Social Groups

📖 Community Representation

Power is shared by giving representation to different social groups:

Reserved constituencies for SC, ST, OBC in Parliament and state assemblies

Reservation in government jobs for backward communities

• Community government in Belgium (for Dutch, French, German speakers)

3.4 Power Sharing among Political Parties

📖 Coalition Government

When no single party wins majority, multiple parties form a coalition government. Power is shared among coalition partners.

Examples: India (UPA, NDA coalitions)

Political parties also check each other through opposition — an opposition party that criticises the ruling party is exercising power!

🔑 Key Vocabulary

  • Majoritarianism: Belief that majority community can rule without respect for minorities — leads to oppression
  • Ethnic/Civil war: War among communities within a country (Sri Lanka example)
  • Prudential: Based on practical advantage, not principle
  • Cohabitation: When president and PM belong to different parties (in French system)
  • Power sharing: Distribution of governmental power among different institutions, organs, social groups